Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA letters track liquid supplement guidance

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Courtesy letters FDA's Division of Dietary Supplement Programs sent in 2010 appear to follow the agency's 2009 draft guidance on distinguishing liquid supplements from conventional foods (1"The Tan Sheet" Aug. 16, 2010). An April 22 2letter to Tahitian Noni International, posted on FDA's docket Aug. 24, says the Provo, Utah, firm's Tahitian Noni Original Bioactive Beverage products cannot make structure/function claims as long as they are promoted as beverages. A February 3letter to Next Generation Beverages of Hoboken, N.J., and a January 4letter to Nada Beverage Co. of Powder Springs, Ga., similarly preclude the firms' beverage products from making supplement claims. The letters are in response to the companies' notifications of supplement claims

Courtesy letters FDA's Division of Dietary Supplement Programs sent in 2010 appear to follow the agency's 2009 draft guidance on distinguishing liquid supplements from conventional foods (1 (Also see "Supplement Firms Must Calculate Risk From Claims To Survive - Attorneys" - Pink Sheet, 16 Aug, 2010.)). An April 22 2 letter to Tahitian Noni International, posted on FDA's docket Aug. 24, says the Provo, Utah, firm's Tahitian Noni Original Bioactive Beverage products cannot make structure/function claims as long as they are promoted as beverages. A February 3 letter to Next Generation Beverages of Hoboken, N.J., and a January 4 letter to Nada Beverage Co. of Powder Springs, Ga., similarly preclude the firms' beverage products from making supplement claims. The letters are in response to the companies' notifications of supplement claims.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS104449

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel