Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

NARB panel confirms recommendations to PatentHEALTH

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The National Advertising Review Board agrees with earlier recommendations by the National Advertising Division that PatentHEALTH discontinue claims that Trigosamine Fast Acting joint health supplement "works" or "gets results" in three days. The claims in question were not supported by a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study submitted by the Canton, Ohio-based firm, the Council of Better Business Bureaus panel reaffirms in a review of an appeal by PatentHEALTH. Additionally, the board sided with NAD that an advertorial for the product reasonably could be perceived by consumers to be a news story. Therefore, the panel recommended the firm discontinue any ads "not clearly and conspicuously identified as an advertisement." PatentHEALTH, which appealed NAD's decision last summer, says it will give "due consideration" to the panel's recommendations (1"The Tan Sheet" July 13, 2009)

You may also be interested in...



PatentHEALTH appeals NAD decision

The Canton, Ohio-based firm appeals the National Advertising Division's recommendation to discontinue claims that the Trigosamine Fast Acting joint-health supplement provides "rapid relief." The study PatentHEALTH relies on to make the claims found participants walked farther after taking Trigosamine FA for three days than those taking a placebo. The advertising watchdog said the study was insufficient evidence. PatentHEALTH agreed to discontinue the claim, but will appeal NAD's interpretation of the study to CBBB's National Advertising Review Board. It also will appeal NAD's recommendation to make advertorials look more like ads and less like news articles. NAD recommended the firm not compare its supplement to a competing product based on study-to-study comparisons because there are too many uncontrolled variables between the studies, according to a July 9 NAD report. Nutramax Laboratories challenged PatentHEALTH's claim, NAD said

Xbrane Assembles The Troops As FDA Says No To Lucentis Biosimilar

Xbrane Biopharma was riding the crest of a wave with the EU launch of its biosimilar to Lucentis, following years of toil and investment. However, plans to roll out the product in the US will have to be pushed back – likely – into the middle of 2025, following a US FDA complete response letter.

UK MHRA Updates Assistive Tech And Borderline Regulations

Device classification themes were uppermost in April for the UK regulator, which issued key guidance in two areas prone to complexities. It also contributed to the MedTech Directorate’s one-year progress report.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS103780

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel