Heartland to appeal NAD sweetener decision
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
The maker of xylitol-containing Ideal No Calorie Sweetener says the National Advertising Division's finding against its "More than 99% Natural" claim could deprive consumers of truthful information and "may have dramatic and unintended adverse consequences" for the non-sugar sweetener market. Carmel, Ind.-based Heartland Sweeteners said it will appeal NAD's recommendation to discontinue claims that Ideal is more natural than other no-calorie sweeteners. In a case 1report published Dec. 14, NAD determined that although the synthetic sweetener sucralose makes up less than 1 percent of Ideal's product weight, it accounts for about 80 percent of its sweetness in packet form. Merisant, maker of stevia-based PureVia, brought the challenge to NAD
You may also be interested in...
While endocrine-disrupting evidence was inconclusive, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety recommends more conservative limits on use of homosalate, octocrylene and benzophenone-3 in cosmetic products compared with current requirements under the European Cosmetics Product Regulation.
The risk of inadvertently growing SARS-CoV-2 virus in cell and gene therapies and possibly infecting patients and workers should be assessed and mitigated, the agency advises.
Move was meant to preempt others’ efforts to secure the next six months of Regeneron’s COVID-19 antibody therapeutic.