Supplement stakeholders criticize folic acid-cancer study
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive SummaryA report analyzing the association of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation with increased cancer incidence contains numerous flaws, says the Council for Responsible Nutrition and the Natural Products Association. The Journal of the American Medical Association published the 1study Nov. 18, which looked at two Norwegian homocysteine-lowering trials of patients with ischemic heart disease. Researchers led by Marta Ebbing of Haukeland University in Bergen, Norway, found in the combined analysis of 6,837 patients that the study population had a 25 percent higher incidence of lung cancer than the general population of Norway, where there is no folic acid fortification. NPA's VP of Scientific and Regulatory Affairs Daniel Fabricant called the study "flawed" due to its lack of analysis into intervening factors, including patients' treatment with beta-blockers and statins. Andrew Shao, VP of scientific and regulatory affairs for CRN, said the conclusions are "inconsistent with the larger body of data" on folic acid's benefits and with the inverse relationship between folic acid fortification and lung cancer incidence in the U.S
You may also be interested in...
The amyloid-targeting drug is years behind Biogen/Eisai’s aducanumab, but its subcutaneous administration and the GRADUATE studies’ design could give Roche’s gantenerumab an advantage.
Correvio's atrial fibrillation drug Brinavess will return to a US FDA advisory committee more than a decade after the agency first declined to approve the drug; FDA still has a series of cardiovascular safety concerns related to the drug and is not convinced by data from the European experience.
FerGene bladder cancer therapy achieved a complete response in more than half of patients in its pivotal trial. The joint venture now looks to commercialization and potential expansion of indications.