Prop 65 suit names 56 supplement firms
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
The California attorney general alleges 56 multivitamin marketers violated the state's Proposition 65 by failing to warn that their products included lead. The AG filed the suit Dec. 23 after the Carrick Law Group sent notices to 74 companies the FDA identified as having lead in their multivitamins (1"The Tan Sheet" Aug. 11, 2008, p. 8). The complaint does not name 14 of the companies identified in FDA's study because they have fewer than 10 employees and are not subject to Prop 65, which requires companies to warn when products include chemicals that could cause cancer or reproductive problems
You may also be interested in...
FDA's survey of lead contamination in hundreds of women's and children's vitamin supplements found what many industry stakeholders expected - lead levels in vitamins are not a cause for concern
The appointment of Belén Garijo as CEO of the German major from May next year is a small but significant step on the road to addressing gender inequality at the very top level of management in the world of big pharma.
The FDA has published fresh guidance taking a tougher stance on sponsor reasons for needing more time to respond to complete response letters.