Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Monistat 1 patent suit

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Perrigo has been dismissed from a lawsuit relating to its filing of an abbreviated new drug application for a generic version of McNeil's miconazole nitrate vaginal cream, 2 percent, and suppository, 1.2 grams, the Allegan, Mich.-based private labeler says Sept. 18. The patent litigation, originally filed in April in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, claimed McNeil's patent for Monistat 1 - which generates about $80 million in annual retail sales for the firm - had been infringed. The lawsuit initiated a 30-month stay period, now over, on FDA's approval of the generic product under the Hatch-Waxman Act (1"The Tan Sheet" April 28, 2008, In Brief). Perrigo President and CEO Joseph Papa say generic Monistat is "an important new product in the feminine hygiene category to our retail and wholesale customers," and the firm says it expects to launch it upon regulatory approval

You may also be interested in...

McNeil challenges Perrigo’s Monistat 1 ANDA

Perrigo's abbreviated new drug application for OTC miconazole nitrate vaginal cream, 2 percent, and suppository, 1.2 grams, has been challenged by McNeil, the owner of the Monistat 1 Combination Pack patent, the Allegan, Mich.-based private labeler announces April 21. McNeil filed the suit alleging patent infringement April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The suit initiates the patent process under the Hatch-Waxman Act, placing a 30-month stay on FDA's approval for generic Monistat 1. The combo pack of the antifungal miconazole nitrate vaginal cream and suppository for treating yeast infections had approximately $50 million in sales for April 2007-March 2008, according to Information Resources, Inc., data cited by Perrigo...

Did Sarepta Need To Tell Investors About Its Vyondys 53 Dispute Resolution Request?

Attorneys say Sarepta did not have an obligation to report its appeal, particularly since winning a formal dispute filing with the US FDA is a long shot.

Sarepta’s Vyondys: Renal Toxicity Concerns That Delayed Approval Get Enhanced Postmarketing Scrutiny, Label Warning

Sarepta must perform enhanced pharmacovigilance for serious renal toxicity events and rhabdomyolysis with the Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug, which carries a label warning for renal toxicity. Approval letter includes 2024 target completion date for ESSENCE confirmatory trial.





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts