Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


IADSA on health claims

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Relying solely on human intervention studies to substantiate health claims is impractical and the Codex Alimentarius recommendations for the scientific basis of health claims should take into account the totality of evidence, the International Alliance of Dietary/Food Supplement Associations says. The draft of the recommendations states human trials are the prime source of evidence to back health claims and "makes no reference to evidence based on traditional knowledge and history of use," IADSA says. While human trials are important, they are only one source of information and "all sources of scientific data have inherent limitations, hence the need to focus on the totality of the available data and weighing of the evidence," says David Richardson, scientific adviser to the U.K. Council for Responsible Nutrition and IADSA. CRN and other members of the supplement and nutrition industry have long protested the pharmaceutical model of testing nutrients (1"The Tan Sheet" May 7, 2007, p. 12)...

You may also be interested in...

Supplement Firms Should Value RCTs, But Also Improve Other Research – CRN

Supplement firms must adapt clinical research methods to accommodate the industry's unique challenges and gain acceptance from mainstream medicine, Council for Responsible Nutrition President and CEO Steve Mister said during the trade group's Day of Science workshop May 3

US Lab-Testing Certification Process Will Be Streamlined Under Quick-Start Guide, CMS Says

The US Medicare agency has released a quick-start guide for laboratory certification.

Washington State Ecology Mulls ‘Safer’ Definition While Exploring Phthalate Alternatives In Fragrances

Marissa Smith, senior regulatory toxicologist in the Washington Department of Ecology’s Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction program, discusses what’s next for the state’s inaugural Safer Products go-round. “How we define ‘safer’ is really going to be the lynchpin of this whole process,” she says.





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts