Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

ConsumerLab drops CRN suit

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

ConsumerLab.com has voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit that it brought against the Council for Responsible Nutrition in 2005, which made claims such as injurious falsehoods, trade libel and unfair trade practices, CRN announces Nov. 17. ConsumerLab filed the suit after FTC declined a January 2005 request by CRN to investigate the business practices of the company, which tests supplements for potency and contaminants. In May, a New York Supreme Court judge dismissed eight of ConsumerLab's nine counts, allowing the case to proceed only on the charge of defamation (1"The Tan Sheet" May 29, 2006, p. 9). According to CRN, ConsumerLab dropped the lawsuit "as CRN was about to ask the Court to require ConsumerLab.com to produce additional information and documents about its business practices." In a same-day release, ConsumerLab responded that it dropped the suit because "CRN's legal tactics forced [us] to divert an extraordinary amount of resources to the case"...

You may also be interested in...



Labdoor Closes Door To Jarrow's Challenge In A NAD Review

Labdoor, which offers online sales of products in addition to publishing rankings within product categories based on its evaluations, declined to offer evidence for NAD's review of challenges by Jarrow Formulas.

ConsumerLab/Vitamin Shoppe dispute

The Vitamin Shoppe voluntarily removed its "Especially for Women" multivitamin from store shelves after allegations there are trace quantities of lead in the product, the firm says Jan. 23. The North Bergen, N.J.-based company says its efforts to fully investigate the allegations have been "hampered by the unwillingness of the company making the allegations to share its complete results and testing methodology with us." ConsumerLab.com says it assumes the "allegations" refer to the online testing firm's "findings of a significant amount of lead in the product" and calls the comments by Vitamin Shoppe "false and highly misleading." ConsumerLab.com says "within three hours" of a request from Vitamin Shoppe the firm faxed over a two-page report of the lead test results from two independent laboratories. ConsumerLab's business model has been criticized by industry representatives in the past and the firm attempted to sue CRN in 2006 (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 20, 2006 In Brief)...

ConsumerLab/CRN Suit Centers On Defamation; Other Allegations Dropped

A lawsuit between online testing service ConsumerLab and the Council for Responsible Nutrition will continue on a single count of defamation, according to a recent ruling by a New York Supreme Court judge

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1130765

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel