Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

NUFA hearing

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions held a hearing on the National Uniformity for Food Act (S 3128) July 27. Witnesses included Peter Barton Hutt, Senior Counsel for Covington & Burling (Washington, D.C.), and former FDA Associate Commissioner for Policy William Hubbard. The HELP committee does not expect to vote on the legislation until after the August recess. NUFA was introduced in the House in October 2005. After the bill (H.R. 4167) passed the House in late February, it was referred to the Senate. The companion bill was introduced by Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) May 25...

You may also be interested in...



China Regulatory Probe Slows Nu Skin Growth After Record Year

The firm’s recent explosive growth is expected to slow substantially in the first quarter – to between 20% and 24% – but Nu Skin is confident the steps it is taking in China “make our long-term success more likely.” Analysts have faith in the firm as it works with Chinese officials to resolve an investigation into its business practices.

China Regulatory Probe Slows Nu Skin Growth After Record Year

The firm’s recent explosive growth is expected to slow substantially in the first quarter – to between 20% and 24% – but Nu Skin is confident the steps it is taking in China “make our long-term success more likely.” Analysts have faith in the firm as it works with Chinese officials to resolve an investigation into its business practices.

Will spinach reheat NUFA?

Consumers Union cites the recent contamination of fresh spinach with E. coli bacteria as a reason to oppose passage of the National Uniformity for Food Act (S 3128). The bill, which would unify warning label requirements and preempt state-imposed requirements like California's Prop 65, passed the House in February with an amendment exempting warnings related to dietary supplements. No action has been taken on NUFA since a July Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee hearing, and Consumers Union does not think the bill will be taken up during the lame-duck session. Congress "is not really doing much of a substantive nature between now and the new session," a spokesperson said (1"The Tan Sheet" July 31, 2006, In Brief). However, the group expects NUFA will be reintroduced into the new Congress and notes Speaker-designate Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) opposes the bill. Supplement trade groups have not heard rumblings on the Hill about new movement on the bill in light of the spinach contamination...

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS099613

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel