NAD Similac appeal
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Ross Products Division of Abbott Labs should discontinue ad claims for Similac infant formula that state that nucleotide-supplemented Similac Advance "helps develop a baby's immune system" when compared to non-nucleotide-supplemented formulas. The claims should be withdrawn "unless Ross has competent and reliable evidence establishing that nucleotide supplementation provides better immunity protection (i.e., better resistance to infection and disease)." The National Advertising Division originally upheld several Similac Advance claims challenged by Enfamil LIPIL marketer Mead Johnson (1"The Tan Sheet" Jan. 31, 2005, p. 15). Mead Johnson appealed the decision and the review board determined that "the message conveyed by the advertising is confusing at best." Ross Products is "extremely disappointed" with the review board's decision, but says it will modify the claims to ensure they are not misinterpreted...
You may also be interested in...
Similac Advance Immune Development Claims Upheld By NAD
Claims touting Ross Products' Similac Advance infant formula's effect on immune system development fall short of implying it protects the immune system as effectively as breast milk, the National Advertising Division concludes in a recent review
Lilly Can Rest Easy As Tirzepatide Scores Phase III Sleep Apnea Win
Topline results from two studies in obstructive sleep apnea among obese adults showed efficacy crossing the 50% threshold that physicians have called clinically meaningful.
China’s Public Payer Wants To Define Innovative Drugs As Those With ‘Novel Benefits’
China’s public payer perceives innovative drugs in a different way from that of the country’s top drug regulator, a former senior healthcare security official with knowledge of the matter reveals. The posture has unnerved pharma companies, which have been hit by sharp price discounts.