Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Herbal Medicinals committee

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

First meeting of the European Union's Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products will take place Sept. 23 in Canary Wharf, London. Members of the European Commission, European Parliament and commitee chairman will speak, after which attendees may participate in a Q&A session. The committee was formed as part of Directive 2004/24/EC, which "helps to clarify and streamline rules for marketing of herbal medicines in the European Union [and] also establishes a simplified procedure for registration of traditional herbal medicines within the Community" (1"The Tan Sheet" June 21, 2004, p. 13)...

You may also be interested in...



European Herbal Medicinal Products Committee To Convene In September

The European Union's newly established herbal medicines committee's primary task will be implementing legislation on traditional medicine that went into effect in April

California Bill To Age-Restrict Sales Of Diet Pills Further Along Than Other States’ Legislation

CA, MA and NJ legislatures remain in session with bills active proposing regulations similar to NY law effective 22 April requiring retailers, including online, to ask for proof of age when customers buying consumer health products containing ingredients labeled or promoted for weight loss and bodybuilding benefits appear younger than 18.

CRN Has Standing For Steep Hill To Climb Challenging New York's Age-Restricted Sales

Federal judge finds “misreading of the legislation” in CRN’s argument that state “restricts access based purely on what has been said about the product or its ingredients.” But standing to challenge “means that only CRN is positioned right now to go before the court on behalf of industry,” says CEO Steve Mister.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS097274

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel