CRN safe nutrient intake
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Vitamin and Mineral Safety 2nd Edition provides "supportable data" on safe levels of vitamin and mineral intake that is "far preferable" to Recommended Daily Allowances at a time when Codex Alimentarius is debating science-based standards for supplement regulation, the Council for Responsible Nutrition announces July 30. The publication is a quantitative risk assessment meant to "identify the highest chronic supplemental intake of vitamins and minerals that can be confidently asserted to pose no risk for the majority of the normal adult population," according to author John Hathcock, PhD, VP-scientific & international affairs, who also wrote the first edition in 1997 (1"The Tan Sheet" July 28, 1997)...
You may also be interested in...
VITAMIN E "NO OBSERVED ADVERSE EFFECT LEVEL" OF 80 TIMES RDA PROPOSED BY CRN in a July 8 report entitled "Vitamin and Mineral Safety." The Council for Responsible Nutrition asserts in the report its long-held contention that the Recommended Dietary Allowances set forth by the Food & Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences are "not a valid basis for identifying safe upper intakes of vitamins and minerals." The report provides alternative methods for identifying safe upper nutrient intakes based on the use of "No Observed Adverse Effect Level" (NOAEL) and "Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level" (LOAEL) values for 25 specific nutrients
P&G plans up to double-digit price increases in US baby care, feminine care and adult incontinence and will analyze raw material costs and foreign exchange impacts in its other product categories for other pricing changes.
Vertex and partner CRISPR Therapeutics hope CDX001 can offer a single-use curative regimen for sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia patients. A regulatory filing is possible within 18-24 months.