Wyeth Says Previous Materna Patent Decisions Unfairly Favored State Law
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
A Colorado federal court decision in an 11 year-old vitamin patent infringement case unfairly allowed state law to override federal laws, according to a petition for writ of certiorari recently filed by Wyeth with the Supreme Court
You may also be interested in...
Wyeth Materna Case Closes As Firm Runs Out Of Options
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear Wyeth's appeal of a $58.3 mil. judgment for patent fraud and unjust enrichment, ending an 11-year court battle in the Materna prenatal vitamin line case
Wyeth Materna Case Closes As Firm Runs Out Of Options
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear Wyeth's appeal of a $58.3 mil. judgment for patent fraud and unjust enrichment, ending an 11-year court battle in the Materna prenatal vitamin line case
Wyeth Materna Case Closes As Firm Runs Out Of Options
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear Wyeth's appeal of a $58.3 mil. judgment for patent fraud and unjust enrichment, ending an 11-year court battle in the Materna prenatal vitamin line case