Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Sunscreen Ingredient Name Change Required By Sept. 1

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA will not take enforcement action against sunscreen manufacturers unable to re-label products to reflect required name changes for four ingredients before Sept. 1, the agency said in guidance to industry

You may also be interested in...



Sunscreen Labeling Amendment Would Disrupt Product Supply, Industry Says

A Sept. 1 deadline for amending the names of four sunscreen ingredients on labeling would "unnecessarily disrupt the supply of sunscreen products," the Consumer Healthcare Products Association and Cosmetic, Toiletry & Fragrance Association tell FDA

Sunscreen monograph amendment

Labeling of sunscreen products introduced after Sept. 1 will need to reflect USP name changes for four active ingredients, FDA says in technical amendment published in Federal Register June 20. Changes were proposed by USP in 2000 based on designations approved by U.S. Adopted Names Council. Proposal was accepted in March 2001, becomes effective Sept. 1. New names include meradimate for menthyl anthranilate; octinoxate for octyl methoxycinnamate; octisalate for octyl salicylate; and ensulizole for phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid. Comments on amendment will be accepted until Aug. 19...

Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS095594

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel