McClellan evaluates ephedra
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive SummaryFDA Commissioner Mark McClellan, MD/PhD, asks RAND Corp.'s Paul Shekelle, MD/PhD, if "the available evidence supports a causal relationship at a somewhat less certain level of scientific proof" than the "95% certainty" standard often used in studies, according to an April 4 email correspondence. Shekelle replies that although "95% certainty" level does not exist to link ephedra with adverse events, "we judge that it is much more likely than not that such a relationship exists" and "we are much more than 50% confident that it exists." McClellan also asks whether evidence of a causal relationship "is more certain for the special circumstances suggested in FDA's proposed warning label," such as strenuous exercise or consumption of other stimulants. Shekelle notes RAND report "did not find sufficient evidence to reach firm conclusions," but adds that does not mean the risk is not increased...
You may also be interested in...
After two Indian vaccine makers, Serum Institute of India and Cadila Healthcare joined the fight against COVID-19, Bharat Biotech may follow suit. Others like Hilleman have decided against it for the moment while Panacea Biotech is weighing the pros and cons of developing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine after a sour experience with H1N1.
South Korea’s HLB has begun a new growth phase by taking over US-based clinical stage biotech firm Immunomic Therapeutics. Through the acquisition, it is poised to add new pipeline assets including a Phase II vaccine therapy for glioblastoma and proprietary lysosomal targeting technology.
Less-invasive technologies to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia are fast becoming viable alternatives to medication and surgery. Here's what one researcher in the area, Steven Raman, had to say about the new options.