Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Cytodyne v. EAS

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

EAS held in contempt by Newark, N.J. federal Judge Dickinson Debevoise Dec. 23 for violating preliminary injunction barring it from disseminating allegedly false, misleading ads for BetaLean HP. Contempt finding resulted from EAS' failure to stop making certain claims, including statements that BetaLean HP's proprietary formula enhances the thermogenic effect of the product's original ephedrine/caffeine combination. EAS has since removed the disputed claims from its Web site and, pursuant to the court's order, posted the following statement, which also must be distributed to firm's distributors, retailers: "A U.S. District Court found that this claim is not true and that the proprietary formula has been found to reduce and inhibit the overall thermogenic effect of the ephedrine and caffeine combination." Argument on Cytodyne's motion to dismiss an EAS countersuit will be Jan. 27 (1"The Tan Sheet" Dec. 9, 2002, p. 8)...

You may also be interested in...



Cytodyne “Before-After” Weight-Loss Photos Subject Of EAS Countersuit

"Before-and-after" photos used in ads for Cytodyne Technologies' Xenadrine weight-loss products are false and misleading, a countersuit filed by Golden, Colo.-based Experimental & Applied Sciences alleges

Cosmetics Europe Talks Microplastic: ECHA Frustrations, ‘Value Judgments’ And International Trade Uncertainty

The European Chemicals Agency's microplastic restriction proposal received committee backing in 2020 without changes sought by the cosmetics industry, which faces €15bn in projected costs and scarce alternatives at present. It may come down to EU Member States to decide whether the ECHA restriction proposal is proportionate in balancing environmental goals and socio-economic impacts.

Roche/Genentech Keeps Commitment To External Cancer Innovation

Roche/Genentech oncology partnering maintained a robust dealmaking pace through the pandemic, keeping the percentage of partnered R&D programs at about 50% of the cancer drug pipeline.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1132956

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel