Prop 65 andro litigation
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
California AG "has presented sufficient evidence to create a triable issue of material fact" on whether androstenedione fits within definition of "anabolic steroid," Oakland state court Judge Ronald Sabraw rules Nov. 5, denying supplement marketers' motion for summary judgment in Prop 65 case. Court says SB 1884, which was signed into law in September and requires special content and warning statements on supplements containing steroid hormone precursors, "does not compel the conclusion that andro cannot be an anabolic steroid" (1"The Tan Sheet" Oct. 7, 2002, p. 7). Trial in the case is scheduled for March...
You may also be interested in...
Calif. Ephedra Laws To Be Implemented With Help From NNFA
The National Nutritional Foods Association is working with the California Department of Health to help create standardized education programs for retail employees to enforce the state's new ephedra laws
Sanofi Prepares Pulmonologists As Dupixent Nears COPD Finishing Line
The French drugmaker has identified education as a key challenge ahead of its June action date for the huge-selling IL4/IL-13 inhibitor in the lung condition. An approval would make it the first biologic for the disease.
Global Pharma Guidance Tracker – March 2024
Stay up to date on regulatory guidelines from around the world with the Pink Sheet's Guidance Tracker. The complete Global Pharma Guidance Tracker, with sortable and searchable listings going back to 2014, is available online.