Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Conflict of interest

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

NEJM revises conflict of interest policies for review articles, editorials that do not contain new data. New policy substitutes phrase "authors...will not have any financial interest in a company (or its competitor) that makes a product discussed in the article" with "not have any significant financial interest." Addition of word significant "acknowledges that not all financial associations are the same," editors write in June 13 issue. Significant means a $10,000 annual financial interest, the same de minimis level as that set by NIH, Association of American Medical Colleges. Journal's policy on research grants continues to require that authors cannot have major research support, funding from relevant companies...

You may also be interested in...



Roche/Genentech Keeps Commitment To External Cancer Innovation

Roche/Genentech oncology partnering maintained a robust dealmaking pace through the pandemic, keeping the percentage of partnered R&D programs at about 50% of the cancer drug pipeline.

US FDA Eases Changes For Certain Sterile Injectable Container Closure Materials

To mitigate pandemic disruption of component supply chains, the US FDA said it will downgrade some post-approval change categories for sterile drug container closure systems. The downgrade will cover drugs in shortage and those used to treat COVID-19.

Unprecedented To Lawful: Regulatory Precedent Needed For Cannabinoids’ Use In Supplements?

“This is truly uncharted territory because we’ve never had this situation,” says CHPA regulatory VP David Spangle. Asking Congress instead to instruct FDA to first determine a safe daily limit would be a threatening precedent for the supplement market, says CRN CEO Steve Mister. “That really turns DSHEA on its head.”

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1132956

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel