Prop 65 Andro Litigation Could Include Mini-Trial On Anabolic Steroid Status
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
A California judge overseeing Proposition 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers is expected to decide in July if a mini-trial should be held to determine whether andro is an anabolic steroid
You may also be interested in...
Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision
Settling defendants in California's Prop 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers would pay from $1,341 to $4,546 each to fund "corrective advertising" programs, according to proposed consent judgments filed in Oakland state court
Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision
Settling defendants in California's Prop 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers would pay from $1,341 to $4,546 each to fund "corrective advertising" programs, according to proposed consent judgments filed in Oakland state court
Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision
Settling defendants in California's Prop 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers would pay from $1,341 to $4,546 each to fund "corrective advertising" programs, according to proposed consent judgments filed in Oakland state court