Vitamin price-fixing litigation
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive SummarySumitomo Chemical Co. dismissed from vitamin price-fixing class action due to lack of personal jurisdiction. In an April 24 opinion, D.C. federal Judge Thomas Hogan concludes Japan-based firm "lacks the requisite local contacts to support personal jurisdiction" in the district. Sumitomo was among the nonsettling defendants named in a class action, certified in February, on behalf of direct purchasers of vitamins A, B, C, E, beta carotene and premixes (1"The Tan Sheet" March 4, 2002, p. 11)...
You may also be interested in...
Attorneys say Sarepta did not have an obligation to report its appeal, particularly since winning a formal dispute filing with the US FDA is a long shot.
Sarepta’s Vyondys: Renal Toxicity Concerns That Delayed Approval Get Enhanced Postmarketing Scrutiny, Label Warning
Sarepta must perform enhanced pharmacovigilance for serious renal toxicity events and rhabdomyolysis with the Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug, which carries a label warning for renal toxicity. Approval letter includes 2024 target completion date for ESSENCE confirmatory trial.