Coal tar
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Trial in California Prop 65 litigation over use of coal tar in dandruff shampoos and other OTCs stayed until Jan. 29. Consolidated trial in separate lawsuits brought by the state and Perry Gottesfeld had been slated to begin Oct. 10, but Bergen Brunswig and Reedco requested a stay pending FDA review of the ingredient's safety (1"The Tan Sheet" Sept. 4, p. 16). Other defendants include J&J's Neutrogena division and Denorex shampoo marketer Whitehall-Robins. Reedco is a subsidiary of Tegrin manufacturer Block Drug, which SmithKline Beecham is acquiring for roughly $1.24 bil
You may also be interested in...
Coal Tar Dandruff Shampoo Cancer Risk Negligible, Whitehall Data Indicate
Consumers would have to absorb 29 mcg/day coal tar for California's Proposition 65 warning to be necessary on coal tar-containing dandruff shampoos, Whitehall-Robins states in recent comments to FDA.
Coal Tar Dandruff Shampoo Cancer Risk Negligible, Whitehall Data Indicate
Consumers would have to absorb 29 mcg/day coal tar for California's Proposition 65 warning to be necessary on coal tar-containing dandruff shampoos, Whitehall-Robins states in recent comments to FDA.
Coal Tar Dandruff Shampoo Cancer Risk Negligible, Whitehall Data Indicate
Consumers would have to absorb 29 mcg/day coal tar for California's Proposition 65 warning to be necessary on coal tar-containing dandruff shampoos, Whitehall-Robins states in recent comments to FDA.