Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Food Structure/Function Claims Consumer Research Needed - Nutritionist

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Substantiation for structure/function claims on foods should include evidence of consumers' interpretation of the claims, a nutrition professor suggested at an Institute of Medicine forum on food-based structure/ function claims in Washington, D.C. April 26.

Substantiation for structure/function claims on foods should include evidence of consumers' interpretation of the claims, a nutrition professor suggested at an Institute of Medicine forum on food-based structure/ function claims in Washington, D.C. April 26.

"I believe that we should have some consumer science, not just basic laboratory and/or clinical science, involved in this," said Joanne Lupton, PhD, Texas A&M University. "We really ought to know what that health claim or what that structure/function claim means to the typical consumer."

A lack of consumer understanding about nutrient content, structure/function and health claims on foods was cited by several speakers from consumer research and advocacy groups who suggested shoppers do not distinguish among the three types of claims.

Lupton called for the same level of scientific substantiation for both structure/function and health claims. "We don't say that we're going to give 'A' science to the health claims but we're going to allow 'B-minus' science for structure/function claims. It needs to be top quality science," she said.

Structure/function claims should be prohibited for foods that are not generally healthy, she suggested. "With the health claims, there are disqualifying levels of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol and sodium. I don't see why they shouldn't apply to structure/ function claims also."

Claims "should identify those factors, other than dietary intake of that particular substance, that affect the structure/function relationship," Lupton added. "In other words, if they only work on low-fat diets, that should be spelled out."

FDA Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition Consumer Studies Team Chief Alan Levy, PhD, suggested the negative effect claims have on consumers' search for additional nutrition information about a particular product may justify imposition of certain minimum standards for foods carrying structure/function claims.

He cited research that found consumers who saw claims on the front of food packaging were less likely to read the "Nutrition Facts" box on the back of the product, leading them to overlook relevant health information.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS091151

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel