Pfizer stump speech
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Full-page print ad appearing in the Dec. 8 Wall Street Journal maintains Warner-Lambert shareholders are "better off with Pfizer based on all key financial measures" than under a merger with American Home Products. The message, titled "Rhetoric vs. Reality," notes Pfizer is offering $13 per W-L share, an 18% premium to AHP's bid (as of Dec. 6). "Worse still," the ad continues, "AHP is the defendant of mass tort litigation which could lead to substantial unexpected liabilities borne by Warner-Lambert shareholders." Pfizer says it will use the ad again as needed. Separately, the trial date on the Lipitor marketing agreement is set for April 10. W-L filed suit to end the joint agreement (1"The Tan Sheet" Dec. 6, In Brief)
You may also be interested in...
American Home Products will offer "additional value" to its bid for Warner-Lambert if W-L is able to secure the marketing rights to the blockbuster Rx cholesterol-reducer Lipitor, AHP says in a Nov. 30 letter to Warner-Lambert. W-L, which shares marketing rights to Lipitor with Pfizer, filed a counterclaim in Delaware chancery court Nov. 29 to end the partnership as a result of "massive and intentional breaches by Pfizer." In response, Pfizer says it has not violated any agreements and contends Warner-Lambert "has engaged in a series of desperate defensive measures." A court date on Pfizer's request to enjoin the proposed W-L/AHP merger is set for Jan. 24 (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 29, In Brief). W-L sent a letter to its shareholders Dec. 2 explaining the recent events and supporting a union with AHP
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning