This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
HR 2100, which would make the destruction or alteration of product identification codes punishable by fines ranging from $500 to $1 mil., was the subject of an Oct. 21 House Judiciary/Intellectual Property Subcommittee hearing. Concerns raised at the hearing addressed potential consumer harm related to purchasing products of questionable merit. However, American Free Trade Association counsel Gilbert Sandler testifies the bill would place unwarranted restrictions on numerous companies. Similar legislation was introduced by sponsor Robert Goodlatte (R-Va.) in the last Congress, but the measure failed to receive the required two-thirds vote under a suspension of the rules, failing 245-167 (1"The Tan Sheet" Oct. 5, 1998, p. 27). The Consumer Healthcare Products Association is a strong advocate of the bill; companion legislation could be introduced in the Senate by Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) or Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
You may also be interested in...
The Trademark Anticounterfeiting Act legislation (HR 3891) was rejected on the House floor Sept. 28 under a suspension of rules by a voice vote of 245-167. Under the suspension of rules procedures, a two-thirds vote would have been needed to pass the measure.
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning