FDA "Further Litigation" Of Pearson v. Shalala Discouraged By House GOPs
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
A group of House of Representatives members requests FDA decline further litigation of the appeals court decision in the case of Pearson v. Shalala in a Feb. 25 letter to FDA Commissioner Jane Henney, MD. The letter is signed by House Republicans Ron Paul (Tex.), Dan Burton (Ind.), Bob Stump (Ariz.), Helen Chenoweth (Idaho), Merrill Cook (Utah) and John Hostettler (Ind.).
You may also be interested in...
ITV Direct Sues FTC For “Unlawful” Interpretation of FTC Act
FTC's "competent and reliable scientific evidence" standard is unlawful because it is not the "least restrictive" way to regulate commercial speech, supplement marketer ITV Direct argues in a suit against the commission announced Oct. 11
ITV Direct Sues FTC For “Unlawful” Interpretation of FTC Act
FTC's "competent and reliable scientific evidence" standard is unlawful because it is not the "least restrictive" way to regulate commercial speech, supplement marketer ITV Direct argues in a suit against the commission announced Oct. 11
ITV Direct Sues FTC For “Unlawful” Interpretation of FTC Act
FTC's "competent and reliable scientific evidence" standard is unlawful because it is not the "least restrictive" way to regulate commercial speech, supplement marketer ITV Direct argues in a suit against the commission announced Oct. 11