Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Health claims case review by Supreme Court sought by NHA.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

HEALTH CLAIMS CASE REVIEW BY SUPREME COURT SOUGHT BY NHA in an Aug. 4 petition for writ of certiorari. Nutritional Health Alliance and the dietary supplement marketer New Nutrisserie seek a review of the Manhattan federal appeals court decision that upheld the constitutionality of FDA's requirement that companies must obtain approval for health claims prior to their use in dietary supplement labeling. Filed by the New York City firm Bass & Ullman, the writ maintains the preclearance requirement under the Nutrition Labeling & Education Act violates First Amendment rights of free speech ("The Tan Sheet" Nov. 24, 1997, p. 19).
Advertisement

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS088737

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel