Hogil v. Care Technologies
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
False advertising lawsuit settled to the companies' "mutual benefit and satisfaction," according to a statement agreed to by both parties. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed. In its complaint, filed March 4, 1997 in White Plains, N.Y. federal court, Hogil, the marketer of the A-200 line of lice treatment, alleged advertising, packaging, product inserts and promotional materials for Care Technologies' Clear lice treatments were "false and misleading" ("The Tan Sheet" Sept. 22, 1997, p. 7)...
You may also be interested in...
Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
In Brief
Combe sells most of its OTC brands
People In Brief
Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning