Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

California AG suing nine calcium antacid, supplement firms for Prop 65 lead violations.

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

NINE CALCIUM ANTACID, SUPPLEMENT FIRMS BEING SUED BY CALIFORNIA AG because their products contain lead in excess of limits established in Proposition 65 and do not bear the required warnings, the complaint charges. "Each defendant has, in the course of doing business, knowingly and intentionally exposed individuals to lead, a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer and reproductive toxicity, without first giving clear and reasonable warning to such individuals," State Attorney General Daniel Lungren alleges. Prop 65 sets a limit of .5 mcg per day for lead.

You may also be interested in...



Prop 65 Suit Alleges Lead Contamination Of Calcium Supplements

Supplement firm Giantceutical denies allegations that lead levels in its BioCalth Calcium L-threonate products require a special warning label under Proposition 65 in a Nov. 23 filing

Prop 65 Suit Alleges Lead Contamination Of Calcium Supplements

Supplement firm Giantceutical denies allegations that lead levels in its BioCalth Calcium L-threonate products require a special warning label under Proposition 65 in a Nov. 23 filing

Prop 65 Suit Alleges Lead Contamination Of Calcium Supplements

Supplement firm Giantceutical denies allegations that lead levels in its BioCalth Calcium L-threonate products require a special warning label under Proposition 65 in a Nov. 23 filing

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS086651

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel