In Brief: NNFA by-laws
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
NNFA by-laws: The association takes issue with several points raised in a story in the July 29 issue of "The Tan Sheet" (p. 7). NNFA explained that the proposed by-laws in question "would not have added a new membership requirement because it was not a new 'membership level.'" Instead, the proposed change to the by-laws would have added a new dues-paying, non-voting level "appropriately defined as 'non-voting associates,'" NNFA pointed out, adding that this proposal was "entirely separate" from a proposal to revise the association's code of ethics. In addition, the group notes that NNFA Director of Conventions and Meetings Sheldon Metz commented on the proposal as moderator of a discussion on the role of mass markets in the natural products industry. He is not in the position to "set policy [or] officially address the proposed by-law amendments," NNFA noted. The association also said that a quote in the story -- that "approximately 85% of NNFA members represent businesses that gross less than $700,000 a year" -- should have been attributed to a candidate for the NNFA presidency...
You may also be interested in...
Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
In Brief
Combe sells most of its OTC brands
People In Brief
Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning