Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

In Brief: Federal Trade Commission

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Federal Trade Commission: Has eliminated six of its industry guides "as no longer necessary" and is proposing to repeal seven of its trade regulation rules as part of a streamlining effort under the Regulatory Reinvention Initiative, FTC announced in an Aug. 1 report to the President. "The Commission's regulatory review process has been ongoing for some time," FTC said in an Aug. 2 release, adding that "since January 1993, and including the actions announced today, the FTC has reviewed or is in the process of reviewing 21 guides and 25 rules." One of the guides under review is the commission's guide on environmental packaging claims. The report also outlines other recent FTC changes, including administrative changes to reduce industry burdens in complying with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act...

You may also be interested in...



Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

People In Brief

Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning

Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM008605

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel