Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

LIVINGSTON LABS' PMS NATURAL RELIEF CLAIMS QUESTIONED BY NAD

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

LIVINGSTON LABS' PMS NATURAL RELIEF CLAIMS QUESTIONED BY NAD in a recent letter to the firm. The National Advertising Division of the Council for Better Business Bureaus noted in a Dec. 8 release that a full-page print advertisement for PMS Natural Relief appearing in the Nov. 1 issue of First for Women "contained a variety of claims for relief of premenstrual syndrome and its associated symptoms" that were not substantiated. In a Nov. 11 letter to the company, NAD cited several statements in the ad that it found objectionable, including that "gynecologists recommend PMS Natural Relief to patients with premenstrual syndrome" and that the product can quickly eliminate all premenstrual symptoms including "cramps, bloating, fatigue, mood swings, and all . . . other discomforts." The PMS Natural Relief print ad also called the product "a breakthrough treatment to be used during the stressful premenstrual cycles," according to NAD. In addition, the ad claimed that "with PMS Natural Relief you will experience an improved sense of physical well-being and an ability to cope." The Livingston print ad for PMS Natural Relief, NAD said, also maintains that the remedy helps to "instantly relieve" PMS and offers a 30-day supply of the product for $ 15.95. NAD asked Livingston to "provide substantiation for these claims" by Dec. 8. However, the firm did not respond to NAD by that deadline, prompting NAD to issue the Dec. 8 release announcing the "failure of Livingston Labs to provide a timely substantial written response" to the inquiry. The advertising watchdog organization noted, however, that Livingston agreed shortly after expiration of the Dec. 8 deadline to provide a written response by Dec. 30. If Livingston does not meet the second deadline, NAD said it would refer the case to the Federal Trade Commission. In its initial letter to Livingston, NAD asked the company to submit "all representative samples of current advertising." NAD said it would "specify any modifications or additions to the claims" once the division has "reviewed the complete [advertising] campaign."

You may also be interested in...



Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

In Brief

Combe sells most of its OTC brands

People In Brief

Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS082278

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel