Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

ACTIVATED CHARCOAL DECLARED NONMONOGRAPH DIGESTIVE AID INGREDIENT

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

ACTIVATED CHARCOAL DECLARED NONMONOGRAPH DIGESTIVE AID INGREDIENT in FDA's final rule for OTC digestive aid products, published in the Oct. 21 Federal Register. "Although data and information were submitted on activated charcoal," FDA explained, "they were not sufficient to support monograph conditions." Although no monograph ingredients are listed in the digestive aid final monograph, FDA said it would address the status of lactase enzyme in a future amendment to the monograph if data submitted to the agency support monograph status. FDA noted that two manufacturers have submitted results of "several new studies" to demonstrate the effectiveness of lactase enzyme derived from Aspergillus oryzae and A. niger. FDA is "currently reviewing these studies and is awaiting additional information form both manufacturers," the notice states. The two companies that have submitted data are J&J, which markets Lactaid, and Sterling Health, which sells Dairy Ease. The agency had dealt with all other digestive aid ingredients in its "negative" monograph final rules in November 1990 and May 10, 1993 ("The Tan Sheet" May 17, p. 3). Following these two final rules, charcoal and lactase enzymes were the only remaining ingredients awaiting a determination of monograph status by the agency. FDA outlined six studies that were presented to the agency to support the effectiveness of activated charcoal and explained that the "majority of the studies are not presented in sufficient detail for an in-depth agency review." Additionally, FDA noted, the "statistical significance of the findings cannot be verified because of the absence of individual subject data which have never been provided." The agency also determined that the subjects used in five of the six studies were "inappropriate," stating that it is "necessary that the studies be conducted in a population where all subjects have the condition in question." Most of the studies presented relied on volunteers. One investigator used subjects with a history of meal-induced gastrointestinal discomfort but the sample size used (21 subjects in the activated charcoal group and 20 in the placebo group) was too small to demonstrate a "clinically important difference," FDA said. FDA is giving companies until April 21 to remove their activated charcoal-containing OTC products from the market after which time they will be "subject to regulatory action," FDA said. Greenwich, Conn.-based Requa currently markets CharcoCaps, a line of digestive aids containing activated charcoal. In late 1991, the company submitted a petition to the agency requesting that the ingredient be reclassified from Category III (data insufficient to permit classification) to Category I (safe and effective). In April 1992, FDA responded in a letter to the company that the data submitted "do not support the effectiveness of activated charcoal as a digestive aid ingredient for the relief of the symptoms of gastrointestinal distress" and accordingly, activated charcoal "cannot be reclassified to Category I based on these data."

You may also be interested in...



People In Brief

Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning

In Brief

Combe sells most of its OTC brands

Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS082036

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel