Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

OTC ANALGESIC INDICATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED BY FDA'S OTC DRUGS OFFICE

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

OTC ANALGESIC INDICATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED BY FDA'S OTC DRUGS OFFICE in response to concerns raised by the Nonprescription Drugs and Arthritis Advisory Committees, FDA Office of OTC Drug Evaluation Director Michael Weintraub told the committees on Sept. 8. During the June 2 review of Syntex/Procter & Gamble's application for OTC naproxen, the committees suggested that FDA's policy of allowing a wide range of indications, whether proven or not, for OTC analgesics may be outdated ("The Tan Sheet" June 7, p. 5). The policy review, however, will not hold up FDA's evaluation of the naproxen application, Weintraub emphasized. "We feel very strongly that we cannot change the rules of the game after both interacting with the sponsors during the development of the application and accepting that application for review," he said. During the June meeting, the committees expressed concern with approving naproxen for the standard analgesic label (headache, backache, muscular aches, toothache, minor aches and pains associated with common colds, minor pain of arthritis, pain of menstrual cramps and reduction of fever) based on positive studies in only three of the conditions (dysmenorrhea, arthritis and dental pain). "We are certainly aware of those kinds of concerns," Weintraub said in his Sept. 8 presentation. He said that the agency "will certainly re-evaluate the very basis of our policy concerning the generalizability from two of eight models to inclusion of all of the indications. We're going back to square one on that." Weintraub added: "The advice we received from our expert panels in the mid- 1970s must be evaluated using current ideas and [the] knowledge that we have today." He concluded that "advisory committees can act as a reality check . . . questioning what we do and why we do it . . . We very much appreciate that."

You may also be interested in...



Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

In Brief

Combe sells most of its OTC brands

People In Brief

Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS081903

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel