Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Dietary supplement questions

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

As a follow-up to a July 20 hearing of the House Government Operations/human resources and intergovernmental relations subcommittee ("The Tan Sheet" July 26, p. 3), Chairman Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) sends out questions to six researchers who testified at the hearing but were not queried by Towns. The questions included: "How would you define significant scientific agreement?" and "what scientific basis exists, if any, to support distinguishing the regulation of health claims on dietary supplements from those on conventional foods?" Towns is said to be considering additional follow-up activities to the hearing.
Advertisement

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS081801

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel