This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
NDMA and other trade associations representing FDA-regulated industries submitted written comments at June 24 hearing on the repeal of a reg exempting FDA-regulated products from Prop. 65 warning requirements. The industry comments assert that the California EPA "cannot lawfully agree, outside the rulemaking process, to promulgate or repeal a regulation." While an agency "can agree to initiate rulemaking, it cannot lawfully commit itself in advance to any specific result." The California EPA agreed to repeal the exemption in a December 1992 out-of-court settlement of AFL-CIO, et al. v. George Deukmejian, et. al. ("The Tan Sheet" May 17, p. 7)...
You may also be interested in...
Perrigo promotes in pricing, planning
Combe sells most of its OTC brands
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC