Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Carnation infant formula ad claims

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus announced June 11 that Carnation/Nestle "has supported most of the claims for its Good Start and Follow-Up infant formulas but has agreed to modify one claim" describing the products as "leading" formulas. The NAD inquiry followed a challenge from Mead Johnson of Carnation's "gentle" claim for Good Start, which focused on "whether the partial breakdown of milk protein found in Good Start actually affected a baby's tolerance to [the] formula," NAD said. Regarding Follow-Up, Mead challenged what it said were superiority claims. NAD said Follow-Up's claims were warranted because the product "costs less while providing equal nutrition"
Advertisement

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS081535

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel