Pink Sheet is part of the Informa Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

WARNER-LAMBERT CLASS II RECALL OF FRAGRANCE-FREE LUBRIDERM LOTION

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

WARNER-LAMBERT CLASS II RECALL OF FRAGRANCE-FREE LUBRIDERM LOTION was essentially completed in January and the company is currently awaiting word from FDA officially to end the recall. The recall of 61,384 bottles of Lubriderm lotion for dry skin from lot number 911N1Va was due to pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination that occurred at the company's Vega Baja, Puerto Rico manufacturing plant. Warner-Lambert announced the Class II recall in a Sept. 1 letter to wholesalers. (See following chart for other OTC/nutritional product recalls in FDA's March 31 "Enforcement Report.") The contamination was discovered through routine quality assurance testing conducted during the production process, Warner- Lambert commented. The agency has reported a series of quality assurance problems from 1992, affecting prescription products as well as the Lubriderm recall. The Puerto Rico quality assurance unit has "been revamped from top to bottom," the company reported in late November. "New management of the quality functions is in place and a major reorganization is underway to improve quality support operations," W-L told FDA after a late 1992 inspection at the plant. Warner-Lambert said the bacteria was present in the water that was used in the production of the product. Following the incident, the firm has improved its water purification system and instituted more frequent product testing for bacterial contamination. The company said it did not receive any reports of problems associated with the products from consumers.
Advertisement

Topics

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS081310

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel