FDAAA Impact Analysis (Year 4): The REMS Retreat Continues - For Now
This article was originally published in RPM Report
As the fifth year of the REMS era begins, FDA is imposing mandatory programs less frequently than it did even in the first year after the law creating formal risk management plans took effect. But there are some new trends to watch, including the evolution of REMS classes and the emergence of products with REMS-in-waiting.
You may also be interested in...
FDAAA Impact Analysis (Year 5): The REMS Paradox
FDA is approving new molecules at the fastest rate of the REMS era, while actually imposing REMS obligations less frequently than ever. That is good news for sponsors—but it doesn’t make a lot of sense if the REMS are working as intended. After five years, the role of REMS is still very much a work in progress.
Draft Guidances For 2013 Will Grapple With Biosimilars, Track and Trace, Compounding
FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research plans to publish more than 50 new and revised draft guidances this calendar year.
The Commercial Impact of REMS Relief: Nplate/Promacta Sales Spike After Risk Management Changes
Nplate and Promacta aren’t the most important products sold by Amgen and GSK. But they are among the fastest growing in 2012—thanks to a decision by FDA to relax post-market controls at the end of 2011. The change underscores the case for a different approach to REMS in oncology, and may point the way forward for broader use of the new tools in a less intrusive way.