“Lemons for Obesity” Or Sour Grapes? A Key Dissent on Qnexa, With a Twist of Avandia
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Executive Summary
NIH Cardiologist Michael Lauer takes a page out of the Cleveland Clinic playbook and rips an advisory committee for recommending approval of Vivus’ Qnexa for weight loss without demanding a pre-market outcomes study. But this is no Avandia: Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Michael Lincoff is on the other side of this debate.
You may also be interested in...
The Inevitable Outcome: Diabetes Safety Model Expands to Weight Loss…and Beyond?
The cardiovascular outcomes standard used for diabetes drugs since 2008 is moving to weight loss. That is important in itself, but also for what it says about the lessons FDA has taken from the diabetes experience—and what it might mean about regulatory expectations for other chronic drug classes in the future.
“Feasibility” Counts at FDA: Different Approach in Antibiotics
Venture capitalists and other investors in drug development often howl about FDA policy changes that they view as crippling innovation in certain classes. They may not think FDA listens, but clearly the agency does. FDA just doesn’t always agree.
Setting the Stage: Qnexa and the Power of REMS
Vivus’ second trip to an advisory panel was a much happier one, with the company’s weight loss therapy garnering an overwhelming “yes” vote on approvability. The key change? A Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy that will be precedent setting if approved—and that demonstrates the power of REMS even if FDA moves in a different direction with this application.