Chelsea’s Northera: The Perils of Drawing Conclusions in Real Time
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Despite a “yes” vote from an advisory committee, FDA sent Chelsea’s Northera back to the development phase with a complete response letter asking for data from another trial. There may have been nothing Chelsea could have done to get a better result—but the company could have held off on a post-panel victory lap.
You may also be interested in...
Shire’s decision to take its Fabry Disease therapy and go home sets up two possible narratives. One accentuates FDA’s apparent inflexibility and is sure to reinforce calls for legislative changes to the approval standard. The other highlights a recalcitrant or even petulant-sounding sponsor. Neither is likely to sound good to Fabry’s patients.
FDA has approved six new molecules already in 2012--and five were approved without going to an advisory committee. Meanwhile, FDA has held four advisory committees to review new drug applications, and all four ended in overwhelming "no" votes.
Dunn’s participation at the panel meeting ended speculation that he left the US FDA.