State of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Benchmark Survey
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Comparative Effectiveness Research is a phrase with talisman qualities inside the Beltway -- ascribed with almost magical properties to improve product/treatment choices and drive down health care expenditures. Outside the political sphere, the meaning of the term and concepts about how to effect CER are less clear.
You may also be interested in...
The health industry's trade association supports a more formal and expanded federal comparative effectiveness research effort, with one caveat: the effort must be devoted to collecting and disseminating informaiton and not be tied directly to coverae or payment decisions. That aligns the health plans with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and creates a potent base for getting comparative effectiveness into upcoming health reform efforts.
The hot new buzzword with policymakers is comparative clinical effectiveness, and everyone has an idea on how to make it work. But major questions remain: what might a national effort look like? And will payors use it to restrict access to new drugs?
During the last five years, there has beenenormous changes in the health care environment: the implementation of the Affordable Care Act and its many provisions, including the creation of PCORI; the development of health exchanges and a move toward value-based payments, most notably in Medicare programs. In the midst of all this change, what impact will comparative effectiveness research have on health care decision-making?