FDA's Avastin Breast Cancer Withdrawal Sets New Standard, Deters Drug Development
This article was originally published in RPM Report
FDA’s proposal to withdraw the approval of Avastin for MBC is based on a new standard for the efficacy showing that a therapy must make in first-line MBC. The Agency previously -- and appropriately -- followed a more flexible approach based on data showing a medicine’s effect on PFS [progression-free survival] or other disease progression endpoints, together with data on OS [overall survival].
You may also be interested in...
Roche’s former chief medical officer has new career as board member to three companies, including COVID-19 vaccine pioneer Moderna, and is co-founder of a startup seeking to develop more affordable drugs. She helped pave the way for FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation and diversification of Genentech’s clinical trials.
The two-day “streamlined withdrawal” hearing for Genentech’s breast cancer indication for Avastin was an unprecedented regulatory event. Based on how badly it went for the sponsor—and how uncomfortable it was for FDA—there may not be too many imitators any time soon.
The June hearing on the status of Genentech’s metastatic breast cancer indication for Avastin will focus on a long list of substantive disagreements about the data. But any sponsor interested in the future of the accelerated approval process should study the back-and-forth in the hearing process itself.