Ceftaroline: A Success for Biomarker Development
This article was originally published in RPM Report
The regulatory environment for anti-infective approvals is getting better: that is one message from the positive FDA advisory committee review of Forest’s ceftaroline. A corollary message is that the work on biomarkers and improved endpoints (by groups outside FDA) is having an impact.
You may also be interested in...
Optimer’s Dificid (fidaxomicin) oral tablets for C. difficile received a strong endorsement from the Food & Drug Administration’s Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee on April 5. Final approval of Optimer’s application awaits resolution of labeling language regarding the drug’s ability to deter recurrence of C. difficile infections. The drug has an initial (priority review) PDUFA date of May 30.
FDA got a chance to show off its ability to stimulate antibiotic development during an advisory committee review of a new cephalosporin from Forest Labs. In the past, the agency has been faulted for failing to set clear targets for anti-infective trials; with ceftaroline, the agency went to the other extreme, stepping in to support an application with key re-analyses of data.
An effort to identify early biomarkers of antibiotic efficacy is turning toward patient assessments of drug activity. FDA and industry scientists are both participating in the biomarker effort. The attention to patient observations reflects a growing interest at FDA.