FDA "Grids" for More Transparent Risk-Benefit Decision
This article was originally published in RPM Report
FDA is designing a five-item grid as a management tool to explain its risk-benefit decisions in a new more concise format. The model that it has created as a working template confirms a truism about its drug approval tendencies that industry has suspected for years: the baseline for FDA approval is a high-rating of the severity of the disease being treated and the medical need for the product.
You may also be interested in...
FDA’s clinical review teams are starting to approve novel drugs and biologics using a new structured benefit-risk framework developed under PDUFA V. Those assessments ask reviewers to think more broadly about the disease and how a new treatment might fit into the current treatment model. But many reviewers don’t have that information. And that, FDA says, is where patient advocates come in.
July 2010 may have been one of the busiest and most important months ever for the Food & Drug Administration's new drug regulatory group. Here are 10 themes to think about heading into the fall.
The second year of the FDAAA-era is over, and FDA is using its new drug safety tools (Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies and mandatory post-marketing studies) more often. Not only are more drugs requiring REMS and mandatory trials, the burden of those programs is increasing.