"Neutral" Is "Unbiased" In FDA' s Lexicon: Taking the Buzz and Distractions Out of Risk Statements
This article was originally published in RPM Report
FDA is interpreting the new "neutral' standard for direct-to-consumer ads to mean "unbiased." Experts in FDA ad regulation policy are now debating what an advertiser has to do to be unbiased: does it just mean keeping down distractions during the statement of risk information? Or does it mean making an effort not to over-warn?
You may also be interested in...
FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg is not taking the easy way out when she discusses DTC, even in front of Congressional critics of the practice. She does not treat DTC as primarily a regulatory problem for the agency; instead she likes to focus on the public health potential of DTC.
The good news for advertisers: FDA will have more resources for pre-review of ads in 2008, funded by the taxpayers. The bad news: what happens in 2009?
Direct-to-consumer advertising is being blamed in large part for the pharmaceutical industry's eroding reputation. Some of the industry's oldest friends in Congress are proposing moratoriums on DTC ads. PhRMA's DTC guidelines may have mollified Congress and FDA for now. However, with the hundreds of billions of dollars lined up for the Medicare drug benefit, CMS could be the newest player in restricting DTC.