Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Year of the Unpartnered Blockbuster? High Profile Applications Raise Big Questions

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

Several of the highest profile new drug applications pending or expected to be submitted as 2010 begins involve potential blockbuster market opportunities. They also lack Big Pharma partners. Is Big Pharma really that picky? Or are the applications out of step with the regulatory and commercial climate? Either way, intense investor interest will keep FDA in the spotlight.

You may also be interested in...



Weighing the Risks: Vivus View of Regulatory Risks in Qnexa Reprise

A good-news press release from Vivus on the resubmission and acceptance of its application to FDA for the weight-loss drug Qnexa contains an unusually long and descriptive list of the risks involved in the application. This more than boiler-plate “forward-looking” statement adds new interest to the sport of footnote-analysis.

The Qnexa Vote: Beyond the Bean Counting

FDA's Endocrinologic & Metabolic Drugs voted 10-6 against approval of Vivus' weight loss drug Qnexa (phentermine/topiramate) at this time. But committee members were almost unanimous in agreeing that it was a very close call, and their comments captured the nuance of the many issues FDA must resolve in the context of reviewing weight loss drugs in general and this application in particular. Below is our transcript of the discussion by each panelist about the reasons for their vote.

Dendreon vs. CMS:Controversy Is Bigger Than One Product

It appeared as though the controversy over the level of efficacy and benefit from the prostate cancer immunotherapy Provenge ended when the drug was approved by FDA at the end of April. The FDA approval may have just been the halfway point in the product's route through government agencies to the commercial market. Now Medicare is questioning whether the government should pay for the new therapy. The CMS decision is just as important to the biopharmaceutical industry as it is to Dendreon.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS080643

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel