Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


An FDA Committee for FDA Advisory Committees

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

Drug sponsors craving consistency among the Food & Drug Administration's advisory committees take heart: changes are underway to make the process more predictable. FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation & Research is undertaking a one-year review of the advisory committee process to identify "best practices" that can be adopted across all the drug review divisions.

You may also be interested in...

Reconstructing Advisory Committees: FDA Conflict of Interest Policy Will Pose Challenges for Drug Sponsors

Drug sponsors soon will have another hurdle to overcome at advisory committee meetings: significant turnover in the experts asked to consider the approvability of their products. The new policy will help FDA quiet critics of the agency's advisory committee system, but it will also create more noise around the drug approval process.

Lost in Translation: Interpreting Advisory Committees

FDA's advisory committee process has long been criticized for conflict of interest issues. But now those on the inside are questioning whether change is needed. At the same time, some FDA officials don't believe advisory committees add much to the review process. And given resource constraints, FDA is holding committees less and less often. That may be good news for drug sponsors. The public disclosure of an NDA as part of the committee process leaves sponsors vulnerable to attacks that can undermine the future of a drug. Given the sway advisory committees in the court of public opinion, a re-examination of the system is coming.

CBER Staffing Remains Challenging, But Permanent Virtual Work May Help Offset Expected Retirements

Peter Marks predicts that staffing challenges within CBER can be alleviated by offering employees the flexibility to work remotely – permanently. With important posts in the vaccines office still to be hired, it could be an important incentive.


Latest News



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts