A “Precedent-Setting” OTC Switch – And A Case Study In Disregarding FDA’s Advice
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Galderma’s OTC switch application for the acne therapy Differin (adapalene 0.1% gel) cleared an important milestone with a unanimous vote in favor of approval from an FDA advisory committee April 15. FDA urged the committee to consider the application as “precedent setting” given the theoretical risk of teratogenicity – but one committee member was more worried about the bad precedent of approving an application for a sponsor that didn’t do a label comprehension study they way FDA requested.
You may also be interested in...
FDA convened a two-day hearing to solicit new ideas to replace the OTC drug monograph system as part of a broader look at ways to enhance the regulatory model for OTCs. However, the architects of the process strongly urged FDA not to overhaul the system – but instead focus more attention on it. At stake is whether FDA makes an all out push to increase OTC switches in coming years.
Despite obvious similarities in the contentious reviews of Sarepta’s Vyondys 53 and its predecessor Exondys 51, drug developers should focus on the differences between the two reviews.
Latest effort by FDA to re-set reviews for novel opioid analgesics is off to a rocky start after three advisory committee reviews. One unintended consequences may already be apparent: by taking a broad, public health perspective on new formulations, the agency may be inviting arguments based on price.