Cancer Therapies: The Breakthrough Era
This article was originally published in RPM Report
FDA Office of Hematology & Oncology Products Director Richard Pazdur, MD, sat down to discuss the state of cancer R&D, Breakthrough therapies, and how his staff pushes to complete those speedy three-month reviews during The RPM Report’s FDA/CMS Summit for Biopharmaceutical Executives in December. Here is a transcript of the conversation, edited for clarity.
You may also be interested in...
It’s a question FDA has heard on Capitol Hill throughout the 21st Century Cures process: Why can’t all drug review divisions keep pace with the approvals seen in the oncology office – and shouldn’t steps be taken to ease development pathways for “lagging” conditions like Alzheimer’s and rare diseases? In the face of a tougher “Cures” debate in the Senate, FDA issues a white paper to more fully outline its response.
Oncology drug sponsors have gotten used to a “faster-than-Priority” timeline for breakthrough products. Now, FDA is outlining a formal process for its reviewers to use for any “Breakthrough” designated therapy with life-saving potential.
FDA’s second wave of Breakthrough Therapies will look markedly different from the initial flurry of approvals. After an early focus on oncology, FDA is reviewing a more diverse set of applications in the antiviral, vaccines and cardiovascular arenas. And there will be more “breaks” during development as sponsors start to request designations based on earlier data. What will Breakthrough look like in the third year of the program?