Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

FTC v. Endo: Does No-Authorized Generic Agreement Meet Supreme Court Pay-For-Delay Test?

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

FTC alleges Endo's Opana ER patent settlement with Impax gave it time to introduce a reformulated product; agency also challenges side deal on Parkinson's disease drug and Endo's Lidoderm settlement with Watson.

Advertisement

Related Content

FTC Focus On Pay-For-Delay Deals Continues; Endo Agrees To 10-Year Abstention
Pay-For-Delay Deals May Be Smaller After Supreme Court Okays FTC Suits

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS079274

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel